Comparison between different battery types


1. Fundamental Properties and Challenges

Lithium is the first of the alkali metal group (atomic number 3), making it extremely light. It holds the highest value in the electrochemical series (−3.04 V), which makes it ideal for high-energy electrical storage. However, it is highly reactive; metallic lithium burns upon contact with oxygen. While lithium makes up only 0.006% of the Earth’s crust, it is widely dispersed rather than concentrated, making extraction difficult and ecologically impactful due to land use and dust generation.

2. Current Charging and Safety (BMS)

Charging lithium batteries is more complex than traditional lead-acid batteries. Key requirements include:

  • Balancing: Multi-cell batteries require a “balancer” to ensure all cells maintain equal charge; without this, weak cells can overcharge, leading to capacity loss or thermal runaway.
  • Management: Integrated Battery Management Systems (BMS) are essential for safety in end-user products like solar storage.
  • Resistance: Lithium batteries have extremely low internal resistance, which may require current limiters to protect charging equipment like alternators.
  • Thermal Risks: Internal short circuits can be caused by “dendrites” (microscopic spikes) piercing the separator due to overcharging or mechanical stress.

3. Emerging Battery Technologies

The industry is moving toward several next-generation solutions to address current limitations:

Solid-State Batteries

These replace liquid electrolytes with solid versions, offering nearly double the energy density of conventional batteries.

  • Safety: The lack of liquid electrolyte significantly reduces fire risks and dendrite formation.
  • Performance: They are more resistant to high temperatures and support much faster charging times.

Sodium-Ion Batteries

Particularly prevalent in Chinese research, these use abundant and cheap sodium instead of lithium.

  • Sustainability: They are more environmentally friendly as they do not require rare metals like cobalt.
  • Stability: They perform well at low temperatures and are safer than standard lithium variants.

Silicon Composites

Using pure silicon can enable even higher energy densities than current models. While silicon expands greatly when absorbing lithium (causing stability issues), new composite materials are being developed to stabilize this process, though currently at a higher cost.

4. Global Sourcing and Future Outlook

The supply chain currently faces a high dependency on China, which handles 70% of global lithium production. To mitigate this, new extraction sites are being explored in the US, Europe, and Japan, including:

  • Geothermal sources: Extracting lithium from deep water in the Upper Rhine Plain.
  • Hard rock mining: Projects in the German Ore Mountains (Erzgebirge).
  • Alternative materials: Continued research into lithium-free battery chemistries.

ABCDEFG
1
Battery TypeAbbreviation
Volumetric Energy Density (Wh/l)
Gravimetric Energy Density (Wh/kg)
(V)Charge CyclesCost (€/kWh)
2
Zinc-carbonZn-C80 – 15030 – 801.5(primary)5 – 15
3
Alkaline-manganese
Zn-MnO₂250 – 60080 – 1501.5(primary)10 – 30
4
Zinc-airZN1,000+200 – 4001.4(primary)20 – 50
5
Lead-acidPb-S60 – 9030 – 502300 – 50080 – 150
6
Nickel-cadmiumNiCd100 – 15040 – 601.21,000 – 2,000200 – 300
7
Nickel-metal hydride
NiMH140 – 30060 – 1201.2500 – 1,000150 – 250
8
Lithium-ionNMC300 – 700150 – 2503.6 – 3.71,000 – 3,00080 – 150
9
Silicon-carbonSi-C500 – 900250 – 4003.6 – 3.81,000 – 2,500120 – 200
10
Lithium iron phosphate
LiFePO₄220 – 40090 – 1603.22,000 – 6,00070 – 120
11
Lithium titanateLTO150 – 30070 – 1102.45,000 – 15,000300 – 600
12
Solid-state battery
Li700 – 1,000300 – 5003.7 – 4.21,000 – 5,000150 – 300
13
Sodium-ionSIB200 – 400100 – 1603.0 – 3.31,000 – 3,00040 – 90
14
Lithium SulfurLi-S~350 – 600~400 – 6002.1< 1,000TBD